In Act 1.2, the juxtaposition of Cassius’ commentary about Caesar’s behavior during two nearly fatal experiences and the roar of the crowd is really quite extraordinary. Cassius says:
….Ye gods, it doth amaze me,
A man of such feeble temper should
So get the start of the majestic world,
And bear the palm alone.
Palm is a symbol of triumph, but like Flavius and Marullus before him, Cassius wonders what conquests Caesar brings home that warrant him being able to bear the palm alone. Brutus then replies to another general shout and once this occurs, we can’t help but associate these words and actions with Christ’s triumphant ride through Jerusalem (“through the narrow gate”--??), on a colt, with crowds cheering and strewing the ground with palm just days before he would be betrayed and killed himself.
Cassius does not respond directly to Brutus’ comment about the crowd, but rather continues with his rant:
Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world
Like a Colossus; and we petty men
Walk under his huge legs, and peep about
To find ourselves dishonorable graves.
Men at some time are masters of their fates:
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
But in ourselves, that we are underlings.
These are words that no doubt Brutus remembers and has in mind during his great “tide in the affairs of men” speech in 4.3. The word “man,” here, takes on important implications, too. It’s more than a casual reference, say, like the word “friend.” Cassius is not just calling Brutus friend, but man—as in Brutus represents man and what man is supposed to be. Caesar may be a Colossus, but he is no man, according to Cassius. According to Cassius, there are men (who are petty), and there is man (which is Brutus). This gets reinforced later when Antony says over the corpse of Brutus, “This was a man!” Over the corpse of Caesar, he says, “This was a Caesar,” but over the body of Brutus he says, “This was a man.” Of the three—Caesar-Colossus, men, and man—Brutus is the greatest.
But what does “the narrow world” mean? First, it is “the majestic world,” but then it is “the narrow world.” Do these words this diminish the size of the world? Do these words flatten the world? When Christ spoke of “the narrow gate,” he spoke of it as the hard road, the path of most resistance, to spiritual excellence. By bestriding the narrow world like a Colossus, is Cassius suggesting that Caesar is crushing the road by which men may grow or improve, materially and spiritually? By placing the fault in ourselves that we are underlings, Cassius is expressing a concern for the soul. In order for the narrow world to inherit its majesty once again, and in order for the petty to inherit the majestic world, Brutus must act as redeemer and take down the giant.
Your drawing the parallel between Jesus Christ and Julius Caesar (note the same initials--you can be sure Shakespeare was very aware of it!) is also excellent, and I heartily agree with your detection of the allusion to "the narrow gate" (which perhaps, though, has been previously seen by other scholars, you might want to check).
ReplyDeleteAnd isn't it also interesting that both Jesus and Julius are murdered by Romans!
Cheers,
Arnie Perlstein
sharpelvessociety.blogspot.com
I do want to check that out. Several footnotes that I examined did not have anything to say about "the narrow world," but I would like to read more on this, if it's out there, if you can point me to it. Mack? Kermode?
ReplyDeleteI never for a second doubt the Judeo-Christian/Biblical implications/intentions of his work. I have no doubt that Shakespeare cried when he read Plutarch, as he thought of Christ when reading about the murder of Caesar. I have no doubt that Shakespeare believed that these were the two saddest moments in history (still are). I think the sadness that he felt over these two moments is at the heart of a great deal of his work. Betrayal is certainly at the heart of the canon, but I think betrayal with these two circumstances in mind and heart....
There is a comment here....
ReplyDeletehttp://danteworlds.laits.utexas.edu/circle9.html
...which suggests to me that Dante saw Judas as being closely connected to Brutus and Cassius, which fits with these speeches in Julius Caesar where Cassius seems to be parodying the passage in Matthew the way Judas might have mocked Jesus.
I have considered Dante's pairing of Brutus and Judas in hell, but am now glad to have the "mocking passages" to think about. I have another idea about Brutus, too. For a blog to come....
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to it!
ReplyDelete